Home
Explore Cables Locations Map ISP status Shutdowns
Live Live Map Health Latency Deployments by year Pulse Big screen 🖥
Learn Research Guide Methodology
HomeSubmarine Cables › Blue

Blue

In Service

5,055 km · 10 Landing Points · 6 Countries · Ready for Service: 2023

Ctrl + Scroll to zoom
👆 Tap to interact with map

Specifications

Length5,055 km
StatusIn Service
Ready for Service2023
Landing Points10
Countries6

Owners

Google Sparkle Zain Omantel International

Landing Points (10)

Location Country Position
Aqaba, Jordan JO Jordan 29.5810°, 35.0051°
Bastia, France FR France 42.6973°, 9.4509°
Chania, Greece GR Greece 35.5118°, 24.0122°
Genoa, Italy IT Italy 44.4103°, 8.9389°
Golfo Aranci, Italy IT Italy 41.0048°, 9.6132°
Marseille, France FR France 43.2932°, 5.3726°
Palermo, Italy IT Italy 38.1215°, 13.3584°
Rome, Italy IT Italy 41.9031°, 12.4958°
Tel Aviv, Israel IL Israel 32.0446°, 34.7697°
Yeroskipos, Cyprus CY Cyprus 34.7664°, 32.4666°

⚙ Load profile

+13.9% above night floor · typical for this hour
moderate daily load: +25% at peak hours · usual peak 18:00 UTC · 3 corridors
100 0006121823 00:00 UTC · +12.7%01:00 UTC · +13.5%02:00 UTC · +20.5%03:00 UTC · +23.1%04:00 UTC · +4.3%05:00 UTC · +18.8%06:00 UTC · +19.9%07:00 UTC · +15.3%08:00 UTC · +0.3%09:00 UTC · +14.1%10:00 UTC · +5.1%11:00 UTC · +12.9%12:00 UTC · +8.9%13:00 UTC · +13.1%14:00 UTC · +6.9%15:00 UTC · +11.0%16:00 UTC · +0.1%17:00 UTC · +13.9%18:00 UTC · +24.8%19:00 UTC · +1.6%20:00 UTC · +10.9%21:00 UTC · +9.6%22:00 UTC · +9.2%23:00 UTC · +9.0%
Indirect estimate from diurnal latency rise under load (queueing delay), normalized per corridor to its night floor. This is NOT operator utilization data.

📡 Live Performance

375
measurements
8
probes
139
days monitored
90.8
ms avg RTT
2
anomalies

Monitored from 2026-03-02 through 2026-07-19 - live ICMP round-trip time measurements via our monitoring probes. All values below are recomputed daily from raw probe data.

Measurement sources

Probe Location Samples Avg Min-Max Last seen
#17855 control probe 285 87.3 ms 65.5-376.7 2026-07-05
#6427 own probe Sydney AU 24 252.6 ms 246.7-324.1 2026-07-19
#1015932 own probe Odessa UA 23 51.5 ms 49.3-60.1 2026-07-19
#1014473 own probe Minsk BY 20 47.6 ms 45.8-50.9 2026-07-19
#2261 control probe 15 46.9 ms 45.7-48.2 2026-07-19
#1016031 own probe Kyiv UA 4 58.8 ms 56.3-62.0 2026-07-07
#1014969 own probe Jerusalem IL 2 5.2 ms 5.2-5.3 2026-07-08
#1015984 own probe Balancer IL 2 3.3 ms 3.2-3.4 2026-07-08

About the Blue Cable System

Blue: A Mediterranean Submarine Cable

The Blue submarine cable system connects multiple strategic landing points across the Mediterranean region, spanning approximately 5,055 kilometers. Owned jointly by Google, Sparkle, and Zain Omantel International, the cable is listed as in service and was recorded as ready for service (RFS) in 2023 according to GeoCables data. Its route includes major hubs such as Marseille, Aqaba, and Tel Aviv, making it a key infrastructure for regional and international connectivity. What stands out about Blue is the lack of publicly disclosed technical specifications, such as its design capacity, fiber pair count, supplier, and technology. This absence of transparency makes it difficult to assess its full capabilities, leaving analysts reliant on indirect observations and comparisons with other cables in the region. Additionally, live latency measurements show some anomalies, underscoring the challenges of accurately gauging end-to-end performance over complex internet paths.

Quick facts

NameBlue
Length5,055 km
Ready for Service2023 (GeoCables database)
OwnersGoogle, Sparkle, Zain Omantel International
StatusIn service
Design CapacityNot disclosed
Fiber PairsNot disclosed
SupplierNot disclosed
TechnologyNot disclosed

🗺 Show Blue on the interactive cable map

Route

The Blue cable connects 10 landing points across the Mediterranean region, including Aqaba (Jordan), Bastia (France), Chania (Greece), Genoa (Italy), Golfo Aranci (Italy), Marseille (France), Palermo (Italy), Rome (Italy), Tel Aviv (Israel), and Yeroskipos (Cyprus). This corridor links Europe to the Middle East, facilitating data exchange across diverse geopolitical and economic zones. Marseille serves as a major hub for submarine cables, hosting numerous systems such as 2Africa, Africa-1, PEACE Cable, and SeaMeWe-4. Aqaba and Tel Aviv connect Blue to critical Middle Eastern networks, while Genoa and Bastia provide access to Italy and France, respectively. The cable’s route positions it as a significant player in Mediterranean connectivity.

Why it was built and what it carries

Blue was likely built to enhance connectivity between Europe and the Middle East, providing high-speed data transmission for cloud services, enterprise applications, and internet traffic. Its owners-Google, Sparkle, and Zain Omantel International-are major players in global telecom and cloud services, suggesting a focus on serving both regional and international markets. While its exact design capacity is not publicly disclosed, cables in this corridor typically aim to support tens of terabits per second of data throughput. Blue’s strategic landings in Marseille, Aqaba, and Tel Aviv indicate that it is positioned to serve as a critical link for both regional traffic and intercontinental data exchange.

History: what can be established

GeoCables records the cable as ready for service in 2023. If industry sources suggest a different RFS year, this discrepancy could arise from delays in construction, staggered activation of segments, or differences in how "ready for service" is defined. Publicly available sources do not confirm any alternative RFS year for Blue, leaving GeoCables' 2023 record as the most reliable reference.

Capacity and technology

The design capacity, fiber pair count, supplier, and technology for Blue have not been disclosed in public sources. Without operator documentation, attributing specific values would be speculative. However, given its ownership by Google, Sparkle, and Zain Omantel International, it is reasonable to assume that Blue employs advanced optical transmission technologies typical of modern cables, such as wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM).

Latency: the physics

The computed theoretical latency for one-way light propagation over Blue’s 5,055 km wet segment is approximately 24.8 milliseconds, with a round-trip time (RTT) floor of 49.6 milliseconds. Real-world latency measurements, however, include additional delays from land-based infrastructure, routing, and network equipment. Remote probes measuring the full internet path reveal significant variations. For example, Aqaba to Marseille shows a minimum latency of 65.5 ms and an average of 87.3 ms over 285 checks. However, some reported minimums, such as 3.3 ms for Marseille to Aqaba, are below the physical floor and are measurement artifacts caused by rate-limited ICMP replies. These anomalies highlight the importance of distinguishing between theoretical cable performance and observed internet path latency.

Redundancy: what happens if it breaks

The Blue cable’s corridor is rich in alternative systems. At Aqaba, cables such as ANDROMEDA, Coral Bridge, and Raman provide redundancy. Marseille, a major hub, connects to over a dozen cables, including 2Africa, PEACE Cable, and SeaMeWe-4. Tel Aviv is linked to Jonah and MedNautilus Submarine System, while Yeroskipos connects to PEACE Cable and Medusa Submarine Cable System. These alternatives ensure that disruptions to Blue would not isolate its landing points but could temporarily impact capacity and routing efficiency. Repair logistics for submarine cables typically involve deploying specialized cable ships to locate and fix faults. Given Blue’s Mediterranean route, repair operations would likely be conducted by regional operators with experience in this densely cabled area.

Bottom line

  • Blue spans 5,055 km and connects 10 landing points across the Mediterranean.
  • Owned by Google, Sparkle, and Zain Omantel International, it was recorded as ready for service in 2023.
  • Technical specifications such as design capacity, fiber pairs, supplier, and technology are not publicly disclosed.
  • Theoretical latency is approximately 24.8 ms one-way, but real-world measurements show higher values due to network factors.
  • Redundancy is strong, with multiple alternative cables in the same corridor.

📡 Health

Status✓ Normal
Last checked2026-07-19 12:00

Monitored by our probe network. Open monitoring →

📊 RTT History

Health Timeline

Wed, Jul 8
View full event log →
🔗
Hop Anomaly
4ms → 619ms (169.16×)
05:01
Fri, Jul 3
View full event log →
Marseille
RTT Spike
87ms → 303ms (3.47×)
14:31
Mon, Jun 29
View full event log →
🔗
Hop Anomaly
3ms → 27ms (8.88×)
04:30
Thu, Jun 25
View full event log →
🔗
Hop Anomaly
6ms → 39ms (6.72×)
17:01
Thu, Jun 11
View full event log →
Marseille
RTT Spike
91ms → 187ms (2.04×)
10:31
Wed, Jun 3
View full event log →
🔗
Hop Anomaly
6ms → 1095ms (178.56×)
03:31
Thu, May 21
View full event log →
🔗
Hop Anomaly
8ms → 46ms (5.88×)
05:00
Tue, May 19
View full event log →
🔗
Hop Anomaly
93ms → 286ms (3.05×)
19:00
Thu, May 14
View full event log →
🔗
Hop Anomaly
5ms → 40ms (7.64×)
09:00
Tue, Apr 28
View full event log →
Marseille
RTT Spike
86ms → 295ms (3.41×)
02:30
Sat, Apr 25
View full event log →
Marseille
RTT Spike
84ms → 272ms (3.23×)
10:31
Thu, Apr 23
View full event log →
🔗
Hop Anomaly
25ms → 235ms (9.57×)
15:00
Wed, Apr 22
View full event log →
🔗
Hop Anomaly
22ms → 84ms (3.85×)
17:00
Mon, Apr 20
View full event log →
🔗
Hop Anomaly
4ms → 18ms (4.34×)
16:30
Sun, Apr 19
View full event log →
🔗
Hop Anomaly
5ms → 652ms (126.62×)
01:00
Sat, Apr 18
View full event log →
Marseille
RTT Spike
84ms → 172ms (2.04×)
04:31
Mon, Apr 13
View full event log →
🔗
Hop Anomaly
3ms → 31ms (8.93×)
00:30
Fri, Apr 10
View full event log →
Marseille
RTT Spike
80ms → 171ms (2.14×)
16:32
Sun, Apr 5
View full event log →
Marseille
Resolved
79ms → 66ms
23:31
📊
Marseille
Improving
79ms → 66ms
23:01
📊
Marseille
Improving
79ms → 66ms
22:32
🚨
Marseille
Alert Created
79ms → 66ms (0.83×)
22:30
Marseille
RTT Spike
79ms → 376ms (4.77×)
20:32
Mon, Mar 30
View full event log →
Marseille
Resolved
09:33
🚨
Marseille
Alert Created
78ms → 66ms
04:34
Marseille
RTT Spike
78ms → 377ms (4.83×)
04:03

FAQ

What is the length of the Blue cable?
The Blue submarine cable is 5,055 km long.
Which countries does Blue connect?
Blue connects 6 countries via 10 landing points.
Who owns the Blue cable?
Blue is owned by a consortium including Google, Sparkle, Zain Omantel International.
When was Blue put into service?
The Blue cable entered service in 2023.
Blue
  • Length5,055 km
  • StatusIn Service
  • Ready for Service2023

Calculate Cable Distance

Find the actual cable routing distance between any two cities

Open Calculator →
🌊 Submarine cables 🛤 Land fiber 📡 Live probes
Explore GeoCables: interactive submarine cable map · all 700+ submarine cables · live internet latency map · cable landing points worldwide

🌐 Log In

Access your routes, favorites, and API key

Create account Forgot password?