Home
Explore Cables Locations Map ISP status Shutdowns
Live Live Map Health Latency Pulse Big screen 🖥
Learn Research Guide Methodology
← All articles
Chokepoint

Hachijo Island: Pacific Cable Hub and Global Connectivity Challenges

📈 Live RTT from our measurements · last 30 days
Daily average per cable, in ms; red dots mark days with detected anomalies.
05010015020025030009.0616.0623.0630.0607.07EAC-C2C · 09.06 · 83 msEAC-C2C · 10.06 · 236 msEAC-C2C · 11.06 · 217 msEAC-C2C · 12.06 · 67 msEAC-C2C · 13.06 · 62 msEAC-C2C · 14.06 · 76 msEAC-C2C · 15.06 · 89 msEAC-C2C · 16.06 · 77 msEAC-C2C · 17.06 · 90 msEAC-C2C · 18.06 · 77 msEAC-C2C · 19.06 · 77 msEAC-C2C · 20.06 · 89 msEAC-C2C · 21.06 · 147 msEAC-C2C · 22.06 · 198 msEAC-C2C · 23.06 · 129 msEAC-C2C · 24.06 · 127 msEAC-C2C · 25.06 · 111 msEAC-C2C · 26.06 · 63 msEAC-C2C · 27.06 · 63 msEAC-C2C · 28.06 · 89 msEAC-C2C · 29.06 · 63 msEAC-C2C · 30.06 · 63 msEAC-C2C · 02.07 · 63 msEAC-C2C · 03.07 · 78 msEAC-C2C · 04.07 · 70 msEAC-C2C · 05.07 · 70 msEAC-C2C · 06.07 · 70 msEAC-C2C · 07.07 · 89 msEAC-C2C · 08.07 · 67 msFASTER · 09.06 · 161 msFASTER · 10.06 · 157 msFASTER · 11.06 · 235 msFASTER · 12.06 · 234 msFASTER · 13.06 · 170 msFASTER · 14.06 · 150 msFASTER · 15.06 · 203 msFASTER · 16.06 · 171 msFASTER · 17.06 · 213 msFASTER · 18.06 · 170 msFASTER · 19.06 · 154 msFASTER · 20.06 · 159 msFASTER · 21.06 · 155 msFASTER · 22.06 · 150 msFASTER · 23.06 · 152 msFASTER · 24.06 · 158 msFASTER · 25.06 · 161 msFASTER · 26.06 · 151 msFASTER · 27.06 · 148 msFASTER · 28.06 · 139 msFASTER · 29.06 · 139 msFASTER · 30.06 · 196 msFASTER · 01.07 · 142 msFASTER · 02.07 · 138 msFASTER · 03.07 · 139 msFASTER · 04.07 · 139 msFASTER · 05.07 · 203 msFASTER · 06.07 · 228 msFASTER · 07.07 · 140 msFASTER · 08.07 · 170 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 09.06 · 234 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 10.06 · 184 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 11.06 · 234 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 12.06 · 234 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 13.06 · 185 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 14.06 · 135 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 15.06 · 187 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 16.06 · 234 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 17.06 · 234 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 18.06 · 137 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 19.06 · 241 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 20.06 · 184 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 21.06 · 135 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 22.06 · 239 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 23.06 · 188 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 24.06 · 137 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 25.06 · 185 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 26.06 · 234 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 27.06 · 224 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 28.06 · 135 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 29.06 · 136 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 30.06 · 135 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 01.07 · 136 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 02.07 · 135 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 03.07 · 135 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 04.07 · 214 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 05.07 · 134 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 06.07 · 214 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 07.07 · 131 msJapan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N) · 08.07 · 37 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 09.06 · 68 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 10.06 · 223 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 11.06 · 187 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 12.06 · 62 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 13.06 · 61 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 14.06 · 68 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 15.06 · 76 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 16.06 · 68 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 17.06 · 76 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 18.06 · 69 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 19.06 · 68 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 20.06 · 77 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 21.06 · 176 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 22.06 · 198 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 23.06 · 79 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 24.06 · 75 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 25.06 · 69 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 26.06 · 65 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 27.06 · 65 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 28.06 · 61 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 29.06 · 68 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 30.06 · 61 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 01.07 · 64 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 02.07 · 64 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 03.07 · 62 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 04.07 · 64 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 05.07 · 65 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 06.07 · 62 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 07.07 · 64 msSoutheast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2) · 08.07 · 62 ms

Geometry of the Location: Depths, Shores, Navigation

Hachijo Island, located south of Japan at latitude 33.0000° and longitude 139.5000°, is a critical cable chokepoint in the Pacific region. Its geographical position dictates the routes of submarine cables connecting Asia, North America, and other regions. The ocean depths here are relatively moderate, making cable installation technically feasible. Alternative routes through deeper and more complex sections of the ocean floor increase the cost of installation and maintenance.

Additionally, Hachijo lies on the path between densely populated regions of East Asia and the United States. Cables are concentrated in a narrow corridor to minimize route lengths and ensure direct connections between key economic centers. Navigation in this area also plays a role: cables are laid to avoid active shipping routes, further narrowing possible trajectories.

What’s Packed In: 21 Cables and Their Main Routes

21 submarine cables pass through the area near Hachijo Island. Among them are major routes such as:

  • EAC-C2C (36,500 km): the largest trans-Pacific system connecting Asia with North America.
  • FLAG Europe-Asia (FEA, 28,000 km): one of the oldest and longest cables linking Europe and Asia.
  • Pacific Crossing-1 (PC-1, 21,000 km): a key route between Japan and the United States.
  • Trans-Pacific Express (TPE, 17,968 km): a high-speed data transmission route between Asia and America.
  • FASTER (11,629 km): a cable supporting ultra-fast connections between Japan and the United States.

These cables provide connectivity between Japan, China, the United States, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, and other countries. Their loss could cause significant disruptions to global communications.

Alternative Corridors: Length, Cost, Vulnerability

At first glance, routes bypassing Hachijo might seem like a solution, but in practice, their implementation faces several challenges. For instance, laying cables through deeper areas of the Pacific Ocean increases construction and maintenance costs due to complex geological conditions. Additionally, such routes extend cable lengths, leading to increased data transmission delays.

Other potential paths pass through zones of high volcanic activity or elevated seismic risk, making them even more vulnerable. Thus, even though alternatives exist, they cannot compete with the route through Hachijo in terms of economic and technical feasibility.

Break Scenario Step by Step

If a cable break occurs in the Hachijo zone, the consequences will be noticeable within the first hours:

  • Hours 1-3: Traffic is rerouted to backup routes, but due to the concentration of cables in one corridor, many of them will become overloaded.
  • Hours 3-6: Data transmission delays increase, especially between Asia and North America. Countries such as Japan, the United States, and China begin experiencing issues with internet services.
  • Day 1: Providers activate satellite channels and other backup systems, but their bandwidth is insufficient to compensate for the losses.
  • Days 2-3: Efforts to locate and repair the damaged cable begin. Depending on the nature of the damage, restoration may take anywhere from several days to several weeks.

The key factor here is time. The faster connectivity is restored, the lower the economic impact.

What GeoCables Monitors

GeoCables actively monitors the Hachijo zone in real time. Key parameters include:

  • The status of all 21 cables: any damage or changes in bandwidth are immediately recorded.
  • Data transmission delays: changes in routes and packet delivery times are analyzed.
  • Ship movements: vessels near the cables are tracked to prevent potential damage, such as from anchors.

This approach minimizes risks and enables rapid response to any incidents, ensuring the stability of the global network.

🗺 The zone on the live map
Open the full map →
🛰 Cables in this zone: live status
From our monitoring network; baseline is the cable's normal RTT.
CableLengthRFSRTT nowBaselineStatus
FASTER11,629 km2016170 ms158 msnominal
Southeast Asia-Japan Cable 2 (SJC2)10,500 km202562 ms-nominal
EAC-C2C36,500 km200267 ms-nominal
Japan-Guam-Australia North (JGA-N)2,600 km202037 ms231 msnominal
Southeast Asia-Japan Cable (SJC)8,900 km201381 ms-nominal
Asia Pacific Gateway (APG)10,400 km201661 ms-nominal
APCN-219,000 km2001--nominal
FLAG Europe-Asia (FEA)28,000 km1997--nominal
Evgeny K.
Written by
Evgeny K.
Infrastructure Engineer · Founder of GeoCables
Built GeoCables to monitor submarine cables in real time. Runs a private network of 4 measurement servers with RIPE Atlas probes in Minsk, Almaty, Tbilisi, and Jerusalem.

🌐 Log In

Access your routes, favorites, and API key

Create account Forgot password?